In a recent meeting of the Agriculture Committee, lawmakers discussed House Bill 539, aimed at reforming regulations surrounding high-volume dog breeders in Ohio. The bill, co-sponsored by Representatives Brown and Weinstein, seeks to address significant concerns regarding the treatment of dogs in breeding facilities, particularly in light of Ohio's troubling ranking in the Humane Society's \"Horrible Hundred\" report.
The proposed legislation focuses on three key areas: enhancing inspection protocols, mandating that all surgical procedures be conducted by licensed veterinarians, and redefining what constitutes a high-volume dog breeder. Currently, breeders can evade scrutiny by providing a two-day notice before inspections, allowing them to conceal non-compliant practices. The bill aims to eliminate this loophole, ensuring that problematic establishments cannot escape accountability.
Representative Weinstein highlighted the shocking conditions reported in the Humane Society's findings, which included the use of inappropriate tools for surgical procedures, such as rusty scissors and box cutters. The bill advocates for stricter oversight to prevent such cruelty and to ensure that all cosmetic procedures are performed under proper veterinary care.
Additionally, the current definition of a high-volume dog breeder requires housing six or more breeding dogs and selling at least 40 dogs annually. This threshold has been criticized for being too lenient, as many breeders do not maintain accurate sales records. The lawmakers argue that this allows unlicensed breeders to operate without oversight, potentially leading to further abuses.
The representatives emphasized the need for higher standards in dog breeding, noting that the financial incentives for breeders can be substantial, with potential earnings exceeding $117,000 per year. They believe that the proposed changes will significantly improve the welfare of dogs in Ohio and hold breeders accountable for their practices. The Bridal Welfare Institute has expressed support for the bill and is open to discussing amendments to address any valid concerns raised during the legislative process.