Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Universities face backlash over archaeological training restrictions

August 06, 2024 | California State Assembly, House, Legislative, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Universities face backlash over archaeological training restrictions
In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the impact of new policies on archaeological education and workforce development in California. Participants highlighted that universities are currently prohibiting field schools and lab classes, even when dealing with non-NAGPRA archaeological materials. This restriction has led to a critical shortage of trained archaeologists, particularly in light of increasing demands due to environmental compliance laws.

A workforce study conducted in 2022 revealed that California universities are producing only 60% of the archaeological workforce needed over the next decade. This shortfall is exacerbated by the interim policy adopted by the California State University (CSU) system, which has limited practical training opportunities. Stakeholders emphasized the necessity for a collaborative approach involving tribes, universities, and students to ensure both compliance with NAGPRA and the education of future archaeologists.

Ann Marie Meaden, a past board member of the Society for California Archaeology, pointed out longstanding issues within the California archaeological community, particularly the lack of support from the chancellor's office. She noted that funding remains a critical barrier, despite legislative efforts like Assembly Bill 389 aimed at addressing these challenges. Meaden also criticized the bill's prohibition on using Native American cultural materials for teaching, arguing that it hinders the management of collections and the involvement of students in the process.

The meeting underscored the urgent need for amendments to current policies to facilitate ethical archaeological practices and enhance training opportunities. Participants expressed a commitment to working together to find solutions that respect tribal interests while also fulfilling the educational mission of California's universities.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal