In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around Senate Bill 366, which aims to modernize California's water plan. Don Koepke, representing the California Council for Environmental and Economic Balance, expressed strong support for the bill, emphasizing its goal to transform the current water plan from a mere informational resource into a functional strategy. Koepke highlighted collaborative efforts with various stakeholders, including the California Municipal Utilities Association and the State Water Board, to address cost concerns associated with the bill.

However, opposition emerged from Dennis O'Connor of the Mono Lake Committee, who criticized the bill's fiscal implications, particularly regarding the establishment of targets. O'Connor argued that the costs associated with setting these targets could detract from essential provisions aimed at sustaining public trust resources and minimizing water imports. He suggested that there is ample time to refine the bill, as the next update to the water plan is not due until 2028.

The Department of Finance also voiced opposition, citing an estimated annual cost increase of $2 million, totaling $10 million over the five-year update cycle. This funding would be required for expanded investigations and modeling efforts across the state's hydraulic regions. Despite some agencies estimating minor costs, the Department of Finance warned of potential budget pressures arising from the bill's implementation.

Support for SB 366 was robust, with numerous organizations, including the California Association of Wine Grape Growers and various municipal water districts, expressing their backing. As the committee deliberates, the future of SB 366 remains uncertain, with significant implications for California's water management strategy on the horizon.