Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Woman demands justice after county allegedly steals her land

June 25, 2024 | Santa Barbara County, California



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Woman demands justice after county allegedly steals her land
During a recent government meeting in Santa Barbara, public comment highlighted significant concerns regarding property rights and county oversight. Diana Sandoval addressed the board, expressing frustration over what she described as ongoing injustices related to her property. Sandoval accused the county's Planning and Development department of negligence, claiming that an inspector allowed construction to continue on her land without proper permits, leading to the alleged theft of her property.

Sandoval detailed her grievances, stating that the county facilitated the reconstruction of an unsafe bridge on her property, which she argued was outside of the designated easement. She emphasized that this situation not only violated her constitutional rights but also placed liability for the unsafe structure on her. Despite previous apologies from county officials, Sandoval demanded concrete actions to rectify the situation, including the return of her land and accountability for the Planning and Development department.

She also criticized the county council for failing to provide adequate guidance to the Planning and Development department regarding her case. Sandoval's appeal against the director's decision to exempt the bridge from zoning permits was reportedly dismissed without proper review, which she claimed violated her due process rights.

The chair of the board, Lavinino, reminded Sandoval to keep her comments relevant to the agenda, indicating that her concerns would need to be addressed in a more appropriate forum in the future. The meeting concluded without further public comments, leaving Sandoval's demands for intervention and accountability from the board hanging in the air.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal