In a recent government meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding a proposed construction project in Rehoboth Beach, particularly focusing on the geotechnical implications of the site. A detailed geotechnical report, spanning 137 pages, highlighted core drilling results that indicated the water table is much closer to the surface than previously reported. The chief engineer had noted the water table at 9 feet below ground level, but further analysis revealed it to be around 8 feet in most core drill locations.

The report also warned of anticipated water intrusion at the site, suggesting the need for hydraulic pumps to manage the excess water. This raised critical questions about how the discharged water would be handled—whether it would enter the city’s stormwater system or require alternative solutions. Concerns were voiced about the potential impact on surrounding properties, particularly regarding soil stability and the risk of hydrostatic liquefaction, which could lead to structural issues.

Dr. Trejo, a local property owner, emphasized the need for stringent conditions to be placed on the project before any approvals are granted. He proposed several measures, including comprehensive documentation of adjacent properties, commitments to repair any construction-related damage, and the installation of seismic monitoring systems to detect vibrations that could affect nearby buildings. He also advocated for GPS altimeter monitoring to track any shifts in property elevation during construction.

Public comments reflected a mix of support and opposition to the project. Some residents expressed concerns about the potential for increased vibrations and structural damage to existing buildings, while others highlighted the importance of the project for the city’s future. The discussion also touched on broader implications for the character and skyline of Rehoboth Beach, with some residents fearing that the project could lead to overdevelopment and a loss of the town's quaint charm.

As the meeting concluded, the planning commission was urged to consider these concerns seriously before moving forward with the project, emphasizing the need for a balanced approach that addresses both development goals and community preservation.