In a recent city council meeting, significant concerns were raised regarding the proposed budget, particularly the lack of funding for the Community Assistance and Law Enforcement (CALL) program. William Kilgore, an organizer with the St. Petersburg Tenants Union, criticized the budget for allocating zero dollars to the successful program, which he described as one of the city's best initiatives. He highlighted the stark contrast between the CALL program's funding and the $12 million increase designated for police services, calling the decision \"egregious\" and urging council members to reconsider the budget before its finalization in September.

Kilgore emphasized the importance of the CALL program, which was initiated under former Mayor Kriseman and has continued under Mayor Welch. He argued that the city should prioritize funding for community services that directly benefit residents, rather than providing financial incentives to corporations that do not contribute to local job creation.

Councilmember Floyd echoed Kilgore's sentiments, advocating for a reevaluation of the city's approach to budget allocations. Floyd pointed out that residents bear the burden of utility fees, which disproportionately affect low-income individuals and renters, while property taxes primarily impact property owners, many of whom do not reside in the city. He suggested that maintaining the current millage rate while reducing utility fees would be a more equitable strategy for alleviating the cost of living for residents.

The discussions highlighted a growing tension between funding for community programs and law enforcement, as well as the broader implications of budget decisions on the city's low-income population. As the council prepares for further deliberations, the call for increased transparency and accountability in budgetary priorities remains a focal point for community advocates.