During a recent city council meeting in St. Petersburg, community members voiced strong opposition to the proposed Tampa Bay Rays stadium deal, highlighting concerns over historical injustices and the potential negative impact on local residents.

Representatives from the historic Gas Plant community, which was once a vibrant neighborhood with schools, churches, and markets, expressed their frustration over past displacements caused by the misuse of eminent domain laws. They argued that the same legal instruments that dismantled their community should now be employed to reclaim their lost properties. One speaker emphasized the need for the council to recognize the voices of those affected, stating, \"We need a deal that is more robust, that is targeted around community inclusion and sustainability for households.\"

Brad McCoy, another speaker, criticized the stadium proposal, claiming it primarily benefits a wealthy few while neglecting the needs of everyday residents facing rising costs and infrastructure challenges. He urged council members to reject the deal, asserting that new stadiums often fail to deliver promised benefits to cities and instead pose financial risks to taxpayers.

Dylan Dames, representing Faith in Florida, echoed these sentiments, cautioning against prioritizing corporate partnerships over the needs of vulnerable populations. He highlighted the disconnect between public celebrations of corporate entities and the realities faced by low-income and marginalized residents.

Sierra Clark shared her personal story of displacement and urged the council to consider the historical context of the Gas Plant district in their decision-making. She called for a future that uplifts the community rather than merely commemorating its past.

In a more positive note, Councilmember Driscoll announced a significant federal grant of $27.8 million for the Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, aimed at enhancing public transportation with electric and hybrid buses, alongside workforce development initiatives.

As the meeting concluded, the council faced a pivotal decision that could shape the future of St. Petersburg, balancing the interests of powerful stakeholders against the voices of its residents.