Residents of Elbourne and surrounding areas voiced strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed development project that they believe poses significant risks to local schools and the community. Concerns were raised about the potential increase in traffic and safety hazards for children, particularly at the intersection of Harder and Route 47, which has been described as one of the most dangerous corners in the area.

Melinda Bosanga, a local educator and parent, expressed her frustration, stating that the project lacks consideration for the community's well-being and safety. She urged officials to reconsider their plans, emphasizing the negative impact on the area's reputation and livability. \"This is not a progressive forward development. You guys can do better. Vote no,\" she implored.

Another resident, Dave Sackett, questioned the absence of a referendum to gauge public opinion on the project, suggesting that the decision-makers may not fully understand the community's sentiments. His inquiry was met with a reminder that the meeting was for public comments only, highlighting a perceived disconnect between officials and constituents.

Randy Olson, a trustee from the nearby town of Cortland, acknowledged the importance of community feedback, noting that when residents take the time to attend meetings, their concerns should be taken seriously. He emphasized the need for transparency and accountability in decision-making processes.

The meeting also touched on environmental concerns, with residents worried about the potential for unmonitored excavation activities that could threaten local soil and water resources. One speaker highlighted the risks associated with the removal of protective measures, warning that significant archaeological and ecological findings could go unreported.

As the public hearing continued, it became clear that the community remains deeply divided over the proposed development, with many residents calling for a more thoughtful approach that prioritizes safety and environmental stewardship. The outcome of the meeting and the future of the project remain uncertain as officials weigh the vocal opposition from their constituents.