During a recent government meeting, local farmers voiced strong concerns regarding the proposed five-acre minimum lot size amendment to the 2045 horizon land use plan in Iredale County. The discussion highlighted the potential negative impact on agricultural land preservation and the livelihoods of farmers in the area.

Doug, a dairy farmer and member of the Ardell County Planning Board, emphasized the importance of the land use plan as a protective measure against unrestricted development. However, he expressed significant reservations about the five-acre minimum, arguing that it could hinder farmers' ability to sell their land when necessary, particularly in times of personal or financial crisis. He pointed out that many farmers rely on their land as a primary source of retirement income, and the proposed regulation could limit their options for maximizing land value.

Phil McLean echoed Doug's sentiments, noting that while he intends to continue farming, he is concerned about the future viability of agriculture in the county. He highlighted the need for farmers to have the flexibility to sell their land at competitive prices, especially as development pressures increase. He also suggested that financial incentives for farmland preservation could be explored as an alternative to strict zoning regulations.

Mike McLean, another local farmer, initially supported the five-acre plan but later expressed doubts after hearing community feedback. He called for further study and consideration before moving forward with the amendment.

John Woody, a landowner in the area, reinforced the argument against the five-acre minimum, stating that placing one house on five acres effectively removes that land from agricultural production. He warned that such policies could lead to significant losses of farmland over time.

The meeting concluded with a consensus among the farmers that more time and input are needed to develop a balanced approach that protects both agricultural interests and the community's growth. The planning board is encouraged to reconsider the amendment and explore alternative strategies for land use that would better serve the needs of farmers and the county as a whole.