In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the contentious issue of preserving Limekiln Simmons, a property with historical ties to the community, versus selling it to a developer. The Ambler family, who have been vocal advocates for the preservation of the land, expressed their frustration over the school district's refusal to consider alternatives to the sale.

John Ambler highlighted the long-term financial benefits of preserving open space, citing a county report that indicates such preservation ultimately saves taxpayer money. He criticized the district's claim that selling the property is in the best interest of taxpayers, arguing that this assertion is unfounded. Ambler pointed out that the district has not explored other options, despite proposals from the Ambler family that could address the district's concerns.

Peggy Ambler recounted her family's efforts to clarify the intentions behind a gift of the property from Dorothea Simmons, which she claims was meant for educational purposes. She accused the district of withholding information and playing games regarding the gift, leading to ongoing litigation that has cost the district approximately $200,000. The Ambler family has relied on pro bono legal support, emphasizing their commitment to preserving the land for community benefit.

John Ambler also noted that public interest in preserving Limekiln Simmons is growing, with a petition surpassing 1,000 signatures. He urged the district to terminate the agreement with the developer while it still has the option to do so without obligation, suggesting that this would mitigate further litigation costs and allow for community discussions about the property's future.

The meeting underscored a significant divide between the Ambler family's vision for the land and the school district's current course of action, raising questions about the future of Limekiln Simmons and the community's role in its preservation.