During a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opinions regarding the proposed changes to zoning laws, particularly concerning Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) in the R1 district. One resident expressed concerns about the potential for unoccupied homes to have ADUs, advocating for maintaining current zoning regulations. They suggested that if the city seeks to increase density, it should focus on developing taller buildings downtown rather than altering neighborhood character with ADUs.

The speaker highlighted their personal experience of restoring a previously damaged property and emphasized the importance of thoughtful planning in housing development. They proposed that additional housing could be achieved through existing structures and suggested that any applications for ADUs should be considered on a case-by-case basis to avoid confusion.

Another resident, Gloria Sandoz, criticized the city council for its lack of public engagement and transparency, particularly regarding recent meetings held by local boards that were not widely announced. She raised concerns about the council's oversight powers, questioning the decision-making process behind a grant application aimed at redeveloping local housing. Sandoz lamented the absence of council members at significant community events, calling for greater accountability and involvement from elected officials.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between community desires for maintaining neighborhood integrity and the city's push for increased housing density amid an ongoing affordable housing crisis. Residents are calling for more transparency and active participation from their elected representatives in addressing these critical issues.