During a recent Poughkeepsie City Council meeting, residents voiced significant concerns regarding transparency, public participation, and compliance with federal regulations. A key point of contention was the absence of annual reports mandated by the city charter, which one resident highlighted after a Freedom of Information request revealed that no such documents existed. This raised questions about the council's accountability and willingness to engage with the public.

Residents criticized the council's reluctance to allow public comments before votes on proposed legislation, suggesting that this practice undermines democratic processes. Comparisons were drawn between Poughkeepsie's meeting protocols and those of the Town of Poughkeepsie, which utilizes a hybrid model for public participation, including Zoom access and closed captioning, thereby enhancing accessibility.

Another resident expressed frustration over a lack of communication from Council Member Sue Serena regarding community concerns, particularly about a property at 26 Oakley. The speaker demanded independent verification of asbestos presence in the building and clarity on the council's stance regarding potential litigation related to the property. The call for a community protest was also made, indicating a growing discontent among residents.

Additionally, June Nieman, a local resident, reiterated her concerns about the Emergency Tenant Protection Act, emphasizing the need for continued dialogue on housing issues. The meeting underscored a palpable tension between the council and constituents, with residents demanding greater transparency and responsiveness from their elected officials.