During a recent government meeting, officials addressed ongoing parking concerns raised by residents regarding the proximity of Sports City to a new neighborhood development. Residents expressed frustration over parking overflow from Sports City, which they fear will worsen with the introduction of new homes.

City representatives clarified that while the parking issues are recognized, they are separate from the current site plan application for the townhome development. The zoning for Sports City has not changed, and it was originally approved with a parking study that allocated 159 parking stalls. However, current city codes would require 231 stalls based on updated standards for recreation and entertainment facilities.

Officials noted that Sports City has not expanded its use or built additional parking as previously discussed. They acknowledged that the city can mandate additional parking if there is a change in use, but since Sports City remains unchanged, it is classified as \"legal nonconforming\" under current regulations.

To mitigate parking issues for residents, city officials suggested potential solutions, including the installation of no-parking signs and the possibility of towing unauthorized vehicles from private streets within the new townhome development. However, they cautioned that such measures could also restrict parking for residents.

The discussion also touched on the role of homeowners associations (HOAs) in managing parking, with officials noting that while residents could theoretically rent out their driveways, this practice is not common and would require further exploration.

The city’s traffic committee is aware of the parking challenges and is considering options to address them, although any changes would need to balance the needs of both residents and Sports City patrons.