In a recent government meeting, lawmakers discussed the implications of current solicitation laws, particularly concerning minors. The conversation highlighted a significant legal inconsistency: a minor could face a second-degree felony for soliciting another minor, while adults soliciting adults face lesser penalties.

The discussion revealed that under existing laws, if a 17-year-old solicits a 16-year-old, it is classified as a second-degree felony. In contrast, if the same 17-year-old solicits an adult, it is merely a class A misdemeanor. This discrepancy raised concerns among committee members about the fairness and appropriateness of such penalties, especially given that many of these interactions may be consensual among peers.

Lawmakers noted that while some offenses are tiered based on the age difference between the parties involved, the current framework does not adequately reflect the nuances of these situations. For instance, a 17-year-old engaging with a 10-year-old faces harsher penalties than if they were to engage with a 16-year-old.

The meeting also touched on the broader implications of these laws, with members suggesting that a review or amendment could be necessary to ensure that penalties align more closely with the nature of the offenses. The discussion was paused for further consideration, indicating that this topic will likely resurface in future legislative sessions as lawmakers seek to address these inconsistencies in the law.