In a recent zoning board meeting, members discussed two significant variance applications aimed at facilitating residential development in areas with existing multifamily characteristics.

The first case involved a motion to grant relief from several zoning codes for a property seeking to establish a two-family dwelling. The applicant argued that without the variance, reasonable use of the property would be hindered, potentially diminishing surrounding property values. The board unanimously approved the motion, emphasizing the importance of maintaining the residential character of the neighborhood and the potential positive impact on property values.

The second case centered on a proposal by Attorney Andrew Sullivan to construct a two-family dwelling on Spring Garden Street, where the current zoning regulations require larger lot sizes and frontages than the applicant's property can provide. Sullivan highlighted the predominance of multifamily residences in the area, arguing that the proposed development would not only align with the neighborhood's character but also address the critical housing shortage.

Board members expressed concerns regarding parking availability, given the lack of on-street parking along Spring Garden Street. However, Sullivan reassured them that the developers have successfully built similar projects throughout the city, ensuring adequate parking solutions.

Ultimately, the board found that the proposed developments would not adversely affect public health, safety, or welfare, and would contribute positively to the community's housing landscape. The discussions underscored the ongoing challenges and considerations in balancing zoning regulations with the need for increased residential options in urban areas.