During a recent government meeting in Manchester, significant concerns were raised regarding a subdivision proposal for 388 Elgin Avenue, particularly from local residents who have endured ongoing issues related to construction activities in the area. The meeting opened with a letter from Brittany Moran, a neighbor, detailing numerous grievances about the property owner’s past conduct, including unauthorized construction, safety hazards, and disturbances caused by heavy truck traffic and fireworks.

Moran's letter highlighted a history of complaints, including damage to local roads, lack of compliance with mandated construction hours, and a perceived disregard for neighborly concerns. She emphasized that the property owner has repeatedly failed to adhere to regulations, raising doubts about their capability to manage a safe construction site.

Public comments continued with Susan Kelly, another long-term resident, who described her experience living near the site as a \"living hell.\" She expressed frustration over the lack of permits for the property and raised concerns about environmental hazards, including buried tires and inadequate drainage systems. Kelly urged the board to reconsider the development's viability, citing ongoing erosion and flooding risks.

Glenn Swinson, a resident living above the proposed development, echoed these concerns, questioning the rationale behind the required fill levels for flood safety and expressing skepticism about the project's future impact on the community.

In response to the public's concerns, the applicant acknowledged past unauthorized actions related to the property and confirmed that they are currently pursuing the necessary permits to ensure compliance moving forward. The board indicated that they would take the residents' comments into account as they review the application.

The meeting underscored the tension between development interests and community safety, with residents calling for greater accountability and oversight in the planning process. The board's next steps will be crucial in determining the future of the subdivision and addressing the residents' longstanding grievances.