Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Commissioners urged to certify election results amid controversy

June 22, 2024 | Washoe County, Nevada



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commissioners urged to certify election results amid controversy
During a recent Washoe County Commission meeting, community members voiced strong opinions regarding the certification of election results, highlighting concerns over election integrity and the implications of not certifying valid votes.

Eric LaRue, a longtime resident, urged commissioners to certify the election results, emphasizing that there was no factual or legal basis to contest them. He argued that failing to certify would undermine the democratic process and could potentially violate federal or state law. LaRue expressed concern over a perceived effort by right-wing extremists to disrupt governmental operations and called on commissioners to honor their oaths of office by acting in the best interest of the community.

Nicole Saint John presented data from the Secretary of State's database, claiming that 87.36% of eligible voters in Washoe County participated in the primary election. However, she raised alarms over discrepancies in reported voting methods, noting that the database showed zero votes cast by machine on election day, which she deemed inaccurate. Saint John urged the commission to delay certification until accurate data could be verified.

Drew Rubar, a candidate for Assembly District 40, also requested that the commission refrain from certifying the election results. He pointed out that his name was omitted from the sample ballot, which he argued placed him at a significant disadvantage against an incumbent. Rubar's comments underscored the frustrations of candidates who felt the election process was flawed.

The discussions at the meeting reflect a broader concern among residents about election integrity and the responsibilities of elected officials to ensure that every vote is counted and that the electoral process remains transparent and fair. As the commission deliberates on certification, the community remains attentive to the implications of their decisions on local democracy.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting