In a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opinions regarding a proposed housing development near the RT Park in Clovis, which is intended to support a nearby university. The discussions highlighted a significant divide between supporters and opponents of the project, with concerns centering on the scale and nature of the housing being proposed.

Supporters praised the initiative for its potential to enhance walkability and reduce reliance on cars by providing housing close to campus. They emphasized the importance of creating a vibrant community that accommodates both students and faculty.

Conversely, several residents expressed vehement opposition, arguing that the project has expanded beyond its original scope. Jeff Davis, a local property owner, criticized the transformation of the project from an initial 20 acres to potentially over 100 acres, claiming it would detract from valuable land that could be used for office or light industrial purposes. He raised concerns about the lack of continuity in the development and the potential for the housing to be sold off to the general public, rather than remaining under university control.

Other residents echoed these sentiments, questioning the classification of the housing as \"student\" or \"faculty\" housing. Brian Watt pointed out that the proposed apartments would not be affordable for most students, while Derek Brantley highlighted the potential negative impact on local neighborhoods, including increased traffic and parking issues.

The meeting also revealed a broader concern about the project's alignment with the community's needs. Ed Lund, a nearby resident, emphasized the lack of adequate environmental impact assessments and the potential for increased crime and traffic congestion. He and others called for more transparency and consideration of the community's input before moving forward.

As the meeting concluded, it was clear that the future of the housing development remains contentious, with many residents demanding assurances that their concerns will be addressed before any further steps are taken. The city council is now faced with the challenge of balancing development goals with community interests.