In a recent government meeting, officials deliberated on the selection of a site for a new shooting complex, weighing proposals from Cody and Gillette. The discussions highlighted the strengths and weaknesses of both locations, with a focus on community investment, accessibility, and potential economic impact.

Several board members expressed strong support for Cody, citing its unique marketing opportunities tied to local tourism, including attractions like Buffalo Bill and Yellowstone National Park. They emphasized that Cody's site could draw significant visitors and provide a strong immediate impact on the state. However, concerns were raised about the costs associated with developing the site, particularly regarding access and infrastructure.

Conversely, Gillette was praised for its accessibility and community readiness to support the complex, with officials noting that the town had committed substantial taxpayer dollars to the project. Despite this, some members questioned the long-term sustainability of funding in Gillette, especially in light of potential economic challenges.

The meeting underscored the importance of a public-private partnership in Cody, which was seen as a way to enhance community investment beyond taxpayer contributions. Ultimately, the board faced a challenging decision, with sentiments split nearly evenly between the two proposals. As the discussions progressed, it became clear that the decision would hinge on balancing immediate economic benefits with long-term viability and community support.