Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Fence Dispute Sparks Community Debate Over Property Lines

June 13, 2024 | Pueblo County, Colorado



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Fence Dispute Sparks Community Debate Over Property Lines
During a recent government meeting, homeowners Jason and Candace Gacevich presented their case regarding a fence they installed at their property on South Rand Cocos Drive. The couple detailed their compliance with local regulations, stating they had followed the necessary procedures by consulting with the Pueblo West Metro and the Committee of Architecture before erecting the fence three years ago.

Jason explained that they had requested a site visit from a land use inspector, who confirmed that their fence was appropriately placed more than 15 feet from the road. After receiving no issues for three years, the Gaceviches were surprised to receive a letter from Pueblo County's planning and development department in March, stating that the fence needed to be moved.

The couple expressed their belief that they had adhered to all guidelines, noting that the inspector had previously closed their case after reviewing their paperwork. They emphasized that the fence was intended to enclose their backyard for the safety of their children and dog, and they were under the impression that the location of the fence was acceptable based on prior communications with local authorities.

The meeting included supportive comments from attendees, with one member expressing appreciation for the fence's appearance and indicating a desire for the Gaceviches to retain it. The discussion highlighted the complexities homeowners face when navigating local regulations and the importance of clear communication between residents and government entities.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Colorado articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI