The Georgetown City Council convened on July 22, 2025, to discuss pressing community issues, notably the proposed business park at Wylie Farm, which has sparked significant public concern. During the meeting, several residents voiced their opposition to the project, citing potential economic drawbacks and environmental impacts.

Terry Richards highlighted that while local leaders promote the business park as a tax boon for Georgetown and Scott County, recent data from the city’s chief administrative officer indicates that 60% of the revenue generated would be allocated outside the county. Richards emphasized the need for a thorough cost-benefit analysis before proceeding, warning that taxpayers would bear the full cost of municipal services while only receiving a fraction of the revenue.

Michael Chris raised concerns about the zoning regulations that permit energy plants in the area, questioning the implications of a nuclear power plant potentially being established nearby. He urged the council to consider the community's safety and environmental integrity.

Polly Singer Early echoed these sentiments, expressing skepticism about the park's capacity to generate sufficient revenue, especially given that only 40% would remain in the local economy. She called for transparency regarding the project's scale and its long-term effects on the community.

Anne Hsu criticized the lack of publicly available information regarding the project, noting that key details about funding, potential tenants, and revenue expectations were still unknown despite the impending decision deadline. She stressed the importance of community input and the need for a balanced approach to growth that prioritizes quality of life.

Steve Glass likened the situation to being invited to a fish dinner under unfavorable conditions, arguing that Georgetown should not bear the financial risks associated with the business park without guaranteed benefits. He cautioned against comparing this project to past successes like Toyota, suggesting that the current proposal lacks the same level of preparedness and support.

Katie Polly raised questions about environmental regulations, specifically regarding water quality plans for the proposed development, urging the council to ensure compliance with agricultural standards to protect local waterways.

The meeting concluded with a call for the council to consider the community's concerns seriously, as many residents expressed a desire for a more sustainable and transparent approach to development. The discussions reflect a growing apprehension about the balance between economic growth and preserving the community's quality of life, with many residents advocating for alternative uses of the land that would benefit the community more directly.