Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Compulsory pooling request sparks legal battle over oil rights

June 26, 2024 | Oil, Gas & Mining, Utah Environment, State Agencies, Organizations, Utah Executive Branch, Utah



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches, and alerts at a county, city, state, and federal level.

$99/year $199 LIFETIME
Founder Member One-Time Payment

Full Video Access

Watch full, unedited government meeting videos

Unlimited Transcripts

Access and analyze unlimited searchable transcripts

Real-Time Alerts

Get real-time alerts on policies & leaders you track

AI-Generated Summaries

Read AI-generated summaries of meeting discussions

Unlimited Searches

Perform unlimited searches with no monthly limits

Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots Available • 30-day money-back guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Compulsory pooling request sparks legal battle over oil rights
In a recent government meeting, the Utah Board of Oil, Gas and Mining addressed a request from Ovintiv USA Inc. for compulsory pooling of interests related to the Coliro 16-7-4-28-8-5-7H well in Duchesne County. The well, established for oil and gas production from the lower Green River Wasatch formations, has been a focal point due to the lack of response from several non-consenting owners regarding their participation in the drilling unit.

During the proceedings, representatives from Ovintiv, including legal counsel and expert advisors, outlined the necessity for compulsory pooling, citing that numerous parties had failed to respond to notices sent regarding their opportunity to lease or participate in the well. As a result, Ovintiv is seeking to declare these parties as non-consenting owners, which would allow the company to proceed with the drilling operations without their consent.

The board confirmed that the requisite notices had been published and distributed to all known parties, including the Ute Tribe and relevant federal agencies, with no objections raised against the request. The meeting also highlighted the complexities surrounding ownership claims, particularly those involving estates of deceased individuals, where probate proceedings have not been initiated or are incomplete.

Ovintiv's request includes a proposal for a 300% risk compensation award for non-consenting owners, alongside a joint operating agreement that has been deemed fair and reasonable by the board. The agreement stipulates that non-consenting owners would receive a cost-free royalty of approximately 18.93% based on the average weighted fee royalty in the drilling unit.

The board's jurisdiction over this matter is supported by Utah state regulations, and the absence of timely objections from any parties involved has led to a request for a default ruling in favor of Ovintiv. The meeting concluded with the board's acceptance of the evidence presented, paving the way for further proceedings regarding the compulsory pooling of interests in the drilling unit.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI