Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Wildlife Committee Approves Controversial Night Vision Regulations

May 02, 2024 | Wildlife Resources, Utah Environment, State Agencies, Organizations, Utah Executive Branch, Utah



Black Friday Offer

Get Lifetime Access to Full Government Meeting Transcripts

$99/year $199 LIFETIME

Lifetime access to full videos, transcriptions, searches & alerts • County, city, state & federal

Full Videos
Transcripts
Unlimited Searches
Real-Time Alerts
AI Summaries
Claim Your Spot Now

Limited Spots • 30-day guarantee

This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Wildlife Committee Approves Controversial Night Vision Regulations
In a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around regulations concerning night vision technology and shed antler gathering, reflecting ongoing concerns about wildlife management and hunting practices.

The meeting began with a contentious motion regarding the use of night vision devices. A proposal to maintain the current wording that deemed it unlawful to use such devices failed in a tight vote, necessitating a tie-breaking decision from the chairman. Subsequently, a revised proposal to accept the division's recommendations on night vision passed with a vote of 6 to 2.

In the southern region, discussions highlighted the implications of shed closures on non-resident hunters in Utah. A motion was passed with a 9 to 1 vote, recommending that the board consider making the use of thermal imaging or night vision devices for locating big game a year-round restriction, rather than limiting it to the period from July 31 to December 31. This change aims to address concerns about the use of these technologies during the shed season.

The northeastern region expressed concerns about the division of hunters due to non-resident seasons, but ultimately, a motion to accept the proposals passed unanimously. Meanwhile, the central region split their discussions into two motions. The first, regarding shed antler gathering, passed 8 to 2, with dissent primarily from those worried about restrictions on non-residents and habitat degradation. The second motion, which sought to delay the requirement for check-ins of management and cactus bucks, also passed unanimously, reflecting a desire to wait for technological advancements before implementing such measures.

The northern region similarly passed a motion to accept the recommendations as presented. Overall, the meeting concluded with a summary of the motions, indicating a general consensus on most proposals, while highlighting the need for further discussions on thermal imaging, cactus buck management, and shed antler gathering regulations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Utah articles free in 2025

Excel Chiropractic
Excel Chiropractic
Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI