Residents of Kelsey Glen voiced strong opposition to a proposed subdivision during a recent government meeting, raising concerns over safety, infrastructure, and procedural issues. The plan, which seeks to increase the number of homes from 14 to 23, has been criticized for lacking adequate traffic studies and for its reliance on Ritter Drive, a residential access lane not designed to handle the increased traffic.
Opponents highlighted that the revised plan is significantly worse than the original proposal submitted last year. They pointed out that the removal of a planned Western connector would funnel all traffic through Ritter Drive, which is already narrow and congested. Residents expressed fears that emergency vehicles would struggle to access the area, particularly given the existing parking issues on the street.
The Kelsey Glen Homeowners Association (HOA) submitted a letter detailing these concerns, emphasizing that the proposed variance would exceed the current capacity allowed under local codes by over 150 percent. They argued that the infrastructure is insufficient to support such an increase and that the plan does not meet the necessary standards for a variance.
Several residents, including Tom Gorgon and Bridal Farmer, shared personal experiences and frustrations regarding the development process. Gorgon criticized the developer's plans as poorly constructed and ill-advised, while Farmer urged the board to consider the long-term impact on the community, including potential flooding issues due to the area's topography.
The meeting underscored a broader sentiment among residents who feel that their voices are not being adequately heard in the planning process. Many expressed a desire for the county to take over the review of the project, believing it would lead to a more favorable outcome for the community.
As the public hearing continues, the board of commissioners faces mounting pressure to address these concerns and ensure that any development aligns with the community's needs and safety standards.