During a recent government meeting, significant discussions centered around a proposed gas station development and the necessity of a traffic study before proceeding with the project. City traffic engineer Todd Turban clarified that a traffic study was not mandated for the site, as the transition to a gas station is considered a by-right use, meaning it does not require additional scrutiny under current regulations. He noted that the expected trip generation would not differ significantly from the existing use.

However, Commissioner Justice expressed concerns about the potential increase in traffic resulting from the development. Citing his long history with the site, he argued that the anticipated influx of visitors would likely impact local traffic patterns. Justice proposed an amendment to the Planned Unit Development (PUD) to require a traffic study, emphasizing the need for data to understand the implications of the project fully.

The discussion highlighted a divide among commissioners regarding the necessity of the study. While Turban reiterated that the study was not required, Justice insisted on its importance for informed decision-making. He stated, \"I want to see some data that gives me an element of trust I feel comfortable with,\" underscoring the need for transparency and thorough analysis before any vote.

The amendment to require a traffic study was seconded, but questions arose about the timeline for obtaining the study results. Justice clarified that the data would need to be available before the second reading of the PUD, indicating that without this information, he would not support the project.

As the meeting progressed, it became clear that the outcome of the proposed gas station development hinges on the completion of a traffic study, reflecting broader concerns about urban planning and infrastructure readiness in the face of new developments.