In a recent government meeting, concerns were raised regarding the licensing process for behavior analysts in Georgia, particularly affecting QaBa practitioners. After a lengthy testimony, stakeholders expressed frustration over the lack of response from officials, who moved directly into an executive session without addressing the issues presented.

The discussion highlighted the potential pitfalls of subjective licensing decisions, drawing parallels to experiences in Texas where practitioners faced barriers due to non-merit-based evaluations. Advocates warned that if similar practices were adopted in Georgia, it could severely impact the availability of qualified behavior analysts, with over half of the state's workforce holding QaBa credentials.

The intent behind establishing licensure for behavior analysts is to protect consumers, but stakeholders fear that bureaucratic politics could hinder access to necessary services. They emphasized that delays in the licensing process could lead to increased wait times for families seeking treatment, potentially forcing them to seek care outside the state. The urgency of the situation was clear, as advocates called for a fair and efficient licensing system to ensure that families in Georgia receive timely and effective support.