In a recent government meeting, community members expressed strong opposition to a proposed housing development on 900 East, citing concerns over density, parking, and overall suitability for the area. The proposal involves six three-bedroom units on a 0.4-acre lot, which residents argue is inadequate for the expected number of occupants and their vehicles.

One resident highlighted the lack of parking, stating that with only three designated spots, overflow would likely spill into neighboring streets, exacerbating existing congestion. The community had previously suggested a compromise to reduce the number of units and increase parking availability, but their proposals were reportedly dismissed by the developers.

Another speaker, an engineer, criticized the project’s design, claiming that the proposed homes were misrepresented in terms of size and practicality. She argued that the development would not meet the needs of families, particularly those with young children, due to its three-story layout and insufficient parking. Concerns were also raised about traffic safety, with residents recalling past incidents involving speeding vehicles in the area.

The meeting also touched on broader issues of housing shortages and the need for diverse housing options. Residents expressed frustration over what they perceive as a trend toward high-density developments that do not align with the community's character or needs. They urged city officials to reconsider the implications of such projects on local infrastructure and quality of life.

In a separate discussion, a resident voiced dissatisfaction with local law enforcement's response to community concerns, particularly regarding traffic safety and neighborhood patrols. He criticized the police for their lack of action and called for improvements in community policing.

The applicant for the housing project defended the proposal, stating that they had worked closely with city staff and professionals to ensure compliance with regulations. However, the community's pushback indicates a significant divide between developers and residents regarding the future of housing in the area.