Residents of the Grape Ivy community expressed strong concerns during a recent government meeting regarding a proposed development of 20 townhouses on a narrow lane, a plan that has resurfaced since a similar proposal was rejected in 2019. Community members highlighted issues related to traffic congestion, safety, and the overall impact on their quality of life.

Erin McCormack, a resident who previously advocated against the earlier proposal, reiterated that the current plan for 20 units remains excessive for the area. She emphasized the potential for increased traffic, estimating that the new development could add around 60 vehicles to the already congested Grape Ivy Way, which is characterized by limited access points and narrow roads. McCormack pointed out that the existing infrastructure struggles to accommodate current residents, particularly during peak times when parking and garbage collection exacerbate the situation.

Other residents echoed these sentiments, raising concerns about emergency vehicle access, parking shortages, and the overall density of housing in the area. Jeff Fraser, the HOA president, noted that the road's narrowness has made it increasingly difficult to navigate, especially with the recent increase in traffic due to nearby developments. He warned that adding more units could lead to dangerous conditions, particularly for left turns onto busy 9th East.

Julie Millard shared her personal experience with emergency services, highlighting the challenges faced by first responders in accessing homes on narrow roads. She expressed fears that the proposed development would further complicate these issues, potentially endangering residents' safety.

The Planning Commission discussed the proposal, acknowledging the residents' concerns while also considering the developer's need for viability in their project. The commission noted that the proposal would require further review, particularly regarding compliance with safety standards and infrastructure adequacy.

As the meeting concluded, community members remained apprehensive about the potential approval of the development, fearing it would lead to a significant shift in the character of their neighborhood. The commission's decision on the proposal will be closely watched by residents who are advocating for a balanced approach to development that considers both community needs and growth.