Siding Replacement Sparks Controversy Over Historic Preservation

In a recent government meeting, the proposal to replace the deteriorating wood siding of a historic home built in 1915 was a focal point of discussion. The applicant, represented by Soslan from Burgo Construction, is seeking to replace the existing wood siding with hardy plank lap siding, citing extensive damage from age, termites, and water infiltration as reasons for the replacement.

The staff review indicated that the existing wood siding is too deteriorated to repair, aligning with Mount Dora's historic guidelines, which permit replacement when materials are beyond repair. The proposed hardy plank siding is intended to be painted the same color as the original siding, maintaining visual compatibility with the building's architectural character.

However, the proposal faced scrutiny from board members who expressed concerns about the aesthetic implications of replacing the original siding with hardy plank. One member highlighted that the new material would alter the home's appearance significantly, deviating from the traditional wood clapboard style that is characteristic of the structure. The discussion revealed a divide between the necessity of repairs and the preservation of historical integrity.

Despite the applicant's assertion that the replacement was essential due to the condition of the siding, some board members questioned the extent of the damage, suggesting that not all of the siding required replacement. The debate underscored the challenges of balancing modern construction materials with the preservation of historical architecture.

Ultimately, the staff recommended approval of the application based on the findings that the proposed siding is compatible with the surrounding area and adheres to the guidelines for historic preservation. The board's decision will reflect the ongoing tension between maintaining historical authenticity and addressing practical repair needs in aging structures.