Chimney removal sparks heated debate in historic district meeting

In a recent government meeting, the board discussed an application for the removal of a chimney at 947 Gorham Street, a historic bungalow-style home. The chimney, deemed non-functional by the property owner, Joyce Andress, is not visible from the road and is situated at the rear of the house. The owner argued that removing the chimney would allow for the installation of a metal roof, which they believe would enhance the home's character.

The board's deliberations revealed a split in opinion regarding the chimney's historical significance. While some members expressed concerns about the potential loss of character associated with removing a chimney from an older home, others acknowledged that the chimney does not contribute to the house's historical integrity, as it is not connected to any functional fireplace.

Staff recommendations indicated that the removal of the chimney would be inconsistent with preservation guidelines, which typically discourage the removal of historic roof features unless they are irreparably damaged. However, the board also considered the practical implications of maintaining a waterproof integrity in the proposed metal roof if a hole were to be cut for the chimney.

The discussion highlighted the tension between preserving historical features and accommodating modern renovations. Ultimately, the board faced the challenge of balancing these considerations while adhering to the guidelines that govern modifications in historic districts. The outcome of the application remains pending as the board continues to weigh the implications of setting a precedent for similar requests in the future.