In a recent government meeting, officials discussed critical aspects of housing regulations and public health and safety definitions, particularly in relation to step housing, which encompasses emergency shelters, transitional housing, and permanent supportive housing.

One of the key points raised was the absence of a clear statutory definition for \"public health and safety.\" Officials noted that while there is a general understanding of the term, it lacks specific metrics, particularly in the context of housing. Instead, safety standards are primarily governed by existing building and fire codes, which dictate occupancy limits and safety measures such as fire exits.

The meeting also highlighted the regulatory landscape for occupancy in residential units. State statutes permit cities to regulate occupancy based on short-term rentals or occupant load per square foot, but they cannot limit the number of unrelated individuals living in a dwelling. Local jurisdictions, such as the City of Lakewood, have set maximum density regulations for emergency shelters, while Burien's current zoning does not impose such limits.

Discussion turned to the feasibility of prioritizing local residents for step housing. While it is possible, challenges arise, particularly with emergency shelters that serve transient populations. The example of Bloomside was cited, where a requirement for 30% of units to be allocated for local residents has proven complex and resource-intensive.

The city of Burien is planning for significant housing development, aiming for 75,100 permanent housing units and 1,433 emergency units by 2044. However, recent assessments indicate a revised need for 664 permanent supportive housing units, down from a previously projected 759.

Officials also clarified the distinctions between emergency housing and permanent supportive housing, emphasizing that the latter must meet specific criteria, including sanitation and cooking facilities, to qualify as a dwelling unit under the Washington State Tenant Protection Act.

As the meeting concluded, it was noted that community engagement is essential for housing projects, with ongoing efforts to keep neighborhoods informed through public meetings and outreach initiatives. The discussion underscored the complexities of housing regulation and the ongoing need for collaboration among local governments, housing providers, and the community to address housing challenges effectively.