In a recent meeting, the Shelby County Commission discussed the implications of a lawsuit filed by the Memphis City Council regarding a referendum on gun violence safeguards. The council had sought to amend the city charter to allow citizens to vote on measures aimed at reducing gun violence, but the Shelby County Election Commission announced that these questions would not appear on the November ballot. This prompted the city council to take legal action, seeking support from the county commission.
Commissioner Wright raised concerns about the potential backlash from state officials, particularly Governor Bill Lee, who expressed opposition to the city taking such measures. Wright cautioned that this could jeopardize other pending requests from the county to the state, including funding for a criminal court judge and other legislative priorities.
Commissioner Lowry sought clarification on who would bear the litigation costs, emphasizing that Shelby County is legally obligated to fund the Election Commission's activities. The county attorney confirmed that while some costs could be attributed to the city, the county would ultimately be responsible for funding the litigation.
The discussion revealed a divide among commissioners, with some advocating for a collaborative approach to address the issue of gun violence, while others expressed frustration over the state's perceived bullying tactics. Commissioner Brooks criticized the state legislature for disregarding the voices of Memphis residents, arguing that the referendum was essential for allowing citizens to express their opinions on gun violence.
Several commissioners echoed the sentiment that the current situation reflects broader systemic issues, including disparities in funding and support for urban areas compared to rural regions. They emphasized the need for the county to stand firm against state pressures and to prioritize the safety and well-being of its residents.
As the commission prepares to vote on the resolution supporting the city council's lawsuit, the outcome remains uncertain, with potential implications for the future of local governance and public safety initiatives in Memphis.