In a recent government meeting, significant opposition emerged against the proposed 2.5% corporate transit fee in New Jersey, with business leaders and local representatives expressing concerns about its potential negative impact on the state's economy and job market. Testimonies highlighted that the fee, which is intended to fund New Jersey Transit, could drive businesses out of the state, particularly affecting South Jersey, where transit options are already limited.

Local officials pointed out that neighboring Pennsylvania is reducing its corporate tax rate to create a more business-friendly environment, which could lure companies away from New Jersey. They emphasized that the corporate transit fee would disproportionately burden businesses in South Jersey, where public transit services are scarce and underfunded. The only New Jersey Transit line in the region, the Atlantic City Rail Line, is described as underutilized and often overlooked.

Tom Bracken, CEO of the New Jersey Chamber of Commerce, criticized the fee as a punitive measure against the state's largest employers, arguing that it lacks a direct connection to funding transit services. He warned that retroactive implementation of the fee could force companies to restate their earnings, potentially harming their financial standing and stock prices.

Michelle Sekirka from the New Jersey Business & Industry Association echoed these sentiments, stating that the fee would not foster job creation or economic growth. She highlighted that increasing corporate taxes could lead to higher costs for consumers and reduced investment in local facilities and workforce.

Supporters of the fee, including representatives from the Regional Plan Association and Environment New Jersey, argued that dedicated funding for transit is essential to prevent service cuts and fare hikes that could further degrade the system. They stressed the importance of reliable transit for economic mobility and access to essential services.

The meeting underscored a deep divide between business interests and transit advocates, with calls for a more comprehensive approach to funding and budget management. As the debate continues, stakeholders are urging lawmakers to reconsider the implications of the corporate transit fee on New Jersey's economic landscape.