Little Rock faces stormwater manual showdown as costs soar

During a recent government meeting, officials discussed proposed revisions to the stormwater management and drainage manual for Little Rock, which are crucial for compliance with the city's MS4 permit set to expire at the end of the year. The revisions aim to update a 40-year-old manual that currently does not meet Arkansas Department of Quality (ADQ) water quality standards, which must be addressed by January 1, 2025.

Brad, a city staff member, emphasized the urgency of the vote, noting that the proposal would undergo further scrutiny by the city board. The revisions have sparked significant debate, particularly from local developers and engineers who voiced concerns about the potential financial impact on housing and development costs.

Brian Dale, representing several clients, highlighted that the proposed manual exceeds ADQ requirements and could increase construction costs by $20,000 to $30,000 per home. He urged for more time to allow for community input and collaboration with the consultants to refine the proposal. Tim Daters, another consultant, echoed these concerns, stating that the proposed changes could significantly raise development costs and impose burdensome requirements on developers.

The city staff defended the revisions, stating they are designed to meet state and federal requirements, including an 80% reduction in total suspended solids from stormwater runoff. They acknowledged that while the changes would increase costs, they are necessary to mitigate future flooding risks and comply with environmental standards.

Commissioners raised questions about the implications of not renewing the MS4 permit, which could lead to significant monetary penalties for the city. They also sought clarity on how the proposed changes would affect citizens and businesses, emphasizing the need for ongoing dialogue and input from stakeholders.

As the meeting concluded, the commission faced the decision of whether to vote on the proposal or defer it for further discussion, reflecting the complex balance between environmental compliance and economic feasibility in urban development.