In a recent planning commission meeting, members engaged in a heated discussion regarding the approval of a new school campus and associated water utility infrastructure. The project, which has raised concerns about its expansive nature, was scrutinized for its compliance with local land development codes.

Commissioner Kilgore questioned whether the application was merely for the school’s location or if it encompassed additional structures, suggesting that each building on the campus could require separate approvals. He expressed discomfort with the notion of approving the school alongside a water utility, emphasizing the need for clarity on the approval process.

Kerry Parsons from the planning and community development department clarified that the application was indeed for the location of the school and that the water infrastructure was included as part of the project. She noted that if the water utility were to be considered separately, it would typically be handled administratively rather than through the commission.

The discussion highlighted the broader implications of the project, with Commissioner Carlson advocating for the school as a means to preserve rural life by providing educational opportunities and jobs in the area. He argued that the project aligns with the community's needs and the ongoing development in the region.

Ultimately, the commission voted to approve the application with a majority of eight in favor and one against, despite lingering concerns about the adequacy of water resources and the overall approval process. Commissioner Trowbridge, the sole dissenting vote, reiterated his apprehensions regarding the lack of detailed water reports and the absence of a comprehensive review of the housing component associated with the project.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion on a special district service plan, indicating ongoing developments in the area.