Address Ordinance Sparks Controversy Over Power Access

In a recent government meeting, officials discussed the implications of a newly implemented address ordinance, clarifying its primary purpose and limitations. The ordinance was designed to provide residents with postal addresses, enabling them to receive mail. However, it does not guarantee access to electricity or other utilities for every parcel of land.

A key point raised during the meeting was the distinction between obtaining an address and securing power. Officials noted that while the ordinance allows for addresses to be assigned to properties with a minimum foundation size of 800 square feet, it does not facilitate electricity access for all parcels. A representative from Consumer Energy emphasized that the company’s policies do not permit the provision of power solely based on having an address. Instead, they require a legitimate structure to be in place.

Concerns were voiced about individuals attempting to exploit the system by applying for building permits without the intention of constructing actual homes. This practice could lead to unauthorized use of electricity, which the officials are actively working to prevent. The discussion highlighted the need for clarity regarding the ordinance's intent, which is primarily to establish postal addresses rather than to serve as a means for obtaining utility services.

The meeting underscored the importance of understanding the ordinance's limitations and the necessity for compliance with existing regulations to ensure fair access to resources. As the county continues to navigate these issues, officials reiterated their commitment to maintaining the integrity of the address system while supporting community development initiatives.