In a recent Boulder County government meeting, community members voiced their long-standing concerns and hopes regarding the proposed Boulder East Rail Trail (BERT) along the Union Pacific right-of-way. The discussions highlighted the trail's significance, with some residents expressing frustration over the lengthy wait for its completion—31 years in the making.
One resident, who shared her personal journey of mobility challenges, emphasized the need for the trail to accommodate various users, including pedestrians, cyclists, and horseback riders. She expressed strong opposition to Alternative 2, citing safety concerns due to heavy truck traffic along Belmont Road, and urged the board to consider Alternative 1b as a more viable option.
George Gersel, representing Plan Boulder County and Coalition For Cycling, echoed the sentiment for Alternative 1b, stressing the importance of minimizing wildlife impacts during the trail's development. He called for a careful evaluation of options that would protect the local ecosystem.
Linda Andes, a long-time resident and environmental advocate, raised concerns about the environmental implications of the current trail plan. She urged the board to explore alternative routes that would better protect sensitive wildlife habitats, suggesting that the planning process had not adequately considered the ecological impacts.
Bev Baker, representing the Boulder County Audubon Society, supported the staff's recommendations for the trail, emphasizing the need for protective measures for wildlife and the exploration of less environmentally harmful routes. She highlighted the importance of incorporating mitigation strategies during the planning phase to safeguard local ecosystems.
Catherine Smith, another community member, raised critical questions about adhering to guidance from Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW) and the potential ramifications of not following their recommendations. She underscored the need for a thoughtful approach to balancing recreational use with wildlife protection.
The meeting concluded with a call for further discussion among board members, as they consider the various perspectives and recommendations presented by the community. The future of the BERT remains uncertain, with stakeholders advocating for a balanced approach that prioritizes both recreational access and environmental stewardship.