Residents of Senateville voiced strong opposition during a recent government meeting regarding a proposal to convert a garage into a three-family dwelling at 460 Orleans Street. The meeting featured multiple community members expressing concerns over the potential impact on traffic, parking, and neighborhood congestion.
Cynthia Kane, a resident at 146 Orleans Street, highlighted a 2004 easement agreement that restricts the property to a two-family dwelling, arguing that the proposed conversion would violate this agreement. She emphasized that the garage's proximity to her property line would disrupt her family's privacy and enjoyment of their yard, as construction would require workers to access her land.
Vincent Hayhurst, a nearby resident, raised concerns about not receiving proper notification about the proposal, stating he lives within 100 feet of the site. He expressed frustration over the potential for increased density, suggesting that if the garage could be converted into an apartment, he should be allowed to do the same with his own garage.
Donna Judson, another resident, echoed concerns about traffic congestion, noting that the addition of another residence could exacerbate existing issues on the already busy street. She pointed out that increased parking demands could hinder access for emergency vehicles and school buses.
David Niccolo, a long-time resident, also voiced his opposition, citing the current parking situation where cars frequently line both sides of the street, making it difficult for larger vehicles to navigate.
The board members raised questions about the zoning implications of the proposal, particularly regarding the floor area ratio (FAR) and minimum lot size requirements. One board member noted discrepancies in the application, suggesting that the proposed changes would not comply with existing zoning laws, which require a minimum of 10,000 square feet for a three-family dwelling.
As the meeting concluded, the board closed the public opinion portion without hearing any support for the proposal, indicating a significant community pushback against the planned development. The future of the garage conversion remains uncertain as the board deliberates on the concerns raised by residents.