During a recent government meeting, a property owner raised significant concerns regarding a proposed development that would impact their access route. The individual highlighted that the area in question, which has been referred to as an \"access,\" is actually a prescriptive easement that traverses their property. This easement has been maintained by the property owner, who also bears the costs associated with it, including maintenance and gate expenses.

The property owner expressed frustration that neither the zoning planning committee nor the developer were aware of this easement prior to the discussions about the development. They emphasized that the access route in question is not only inadequate but also critical to their daily life, as it serves as their driveway. The owner voiced concerns about construction vehicles using this driveway, which they maintain, raising issues of legality and personal impact.

The meeting underscored the importance of clear communication and awareness of existing property rights in the planning process, as the property owner articulated their worries about the implications of the development on their property and access. This situation highlights the need for thorough assessments of property easements in future development discussions to avoid conflicts and ensure that all stakeholders are adequately informed.