During a recent city council meeting, discussions centered around a proposed amendment to the Wander Village Plan, specifically Amendment 2, which seeks to modify the lotting plan for townhomes. The amendment aims to increase the number of attached townhomes from six to eight in certain areas, a change that has sparked significant debate among council members.

City staff recommended approval of the amendment, emphasizing that it would enhance flexibility in design and incorporate successful housing types seen in other markets. However, concerns were raised by Councillor McConver, who argued that allowing eight units in a row could detract from the neighborhood's aesthetic and reduce important view corridors. He expressed dissatisfaction with the architectural quality of recent developments, suggesting that the newer phases of Wander Village lack the visual appeal of earlier constructions.

Councillor McConver further contended that the original agreement with the church, which sold the land for development, stipulated a higher architectural standard that he believes is not being met. He voiced strong opposition to the proposed increase in density, stating that it contradicts the city's efforts to maintain a visually appealing urban landscape.

In response, other council members defended the amendment, asserting that the changes would not negatively impact view corridors and that the overall design standards had not diminished. They highlighted the importance of balancing density with community needs and pointed out that the proposed changes would still adhere to the established lotting plan.

The council's deliberations reflect a broader tension between development goals and community aesthetics, as members weigh the benefits of increased housing density against the preservation of visual and architectural standards in the city. The outcome of this amendment will likely set a precedent for future developments in the area.