During a recent government meeting, commissioners engaged in a heated discussion regarding a proposed behavioral health ordinance aimed at addressing the ongoing mental health crisis in Bernalillo County. The ordinance, which has undergone multiple revisions, seeks to establish accountability measures and metrics for behavioral health services funded by taxpayer dollars.

Commissioner Casada expressed reluctance to support the ordinance in its current form, advocating for further staff input before moving forward. He acknowledged the significant work already done by county staff, whom he referred to as \"heroes,\" but emphasized the need for a more thorough process to ensure community needs are met.

Commissioner Benson raised concerns about the authority the ordinance would grant to the commission over the county's behavioral health department, suggesting that it could lead to micromanagement of operations. He highlighted the complexities of behavioral health care and the importance of allowing experienced leaders, like the newly appointed deputy county manager, to make informed decisions.

Public comments revealed a divide among stakeholders. Some frontline workers from the Bernalillo County Behavioral Health Care Campus voiced their frustrations, claiming they had little input in the ordinance's development and expressing fears of retaliation for speaking out. They argued that the ordinance could undermine effective programs that have been in place for years.

Conversely, several community members and service providers supported the ordinance, citing the need for transparency and accountability in behavioral health services. They argued that the ordinance would provide a framework for better service delivery and ensure that funding is used effectively.

As the meeting progressed, the chair called for public comments, allowing various stakeholders to voice their opinions. The discussion highlighted the urgent need for a cohesive approach to behavioral health in the county, with many calling for a balance between oversight and the autonomy of service providers.

The meeting concluded with a call for further deliberation on the ordinance, reflecting the complexities and sensitivities surrounding behavioral health issues in the community.