In a recent government meeting, community members voiced strong opposition to the proliferation of solar energy facilities in Rockbridge County, expressing concerns over the impact on the area's rural character and agricultural land. Residents highlighted the visual and environmental implications of large solar plants, with one speaker describing a 2.5 megawatt facility as an \"industrial site\" that detracts from the county's comprehensive plan aimed at preserving its rural landscape.

Several speakers urged the local government to reconsider zoning regulations for solar and wind complexes, suggesting the establishment of special zoning areas to protect residential neighborhoods from potential industrial encroachment. One resident recounted a personal struggle to prevent a solar complex from being built near their home, emphasizing the desire to maintain the rural ambiance that attracted them to the area.

Stephanie Sellers, another community member, raised alarms about the long-term viability of solar energy projects, citing concerns over water usage and the financial stability of solar companies. She urged the board to remove solar facilities from conditional use permits, referencing negative experiences in neighboring counties where similar projects have been implemented.

Alan Stout echoed these sentiments, sharing his extensive research on solar energy and its perceived shortcomings. He criticized the current trend towards solar development, labeling it a \"scam\" and expressing skepticism about the technology's future.

In response to the public outcry, Chris Sliden, a representative from the Office of Green Development, assured attendees that a draft solar ordinance is in progress and will undergo a public process. He acknowledged the need for a balanced approach that considers both the interests of farmers looking to generate income from their land and the community's desire to preserve its rural character.

The meeting underscored a growing tension between renewable energy initiatives and community values, with residents calling for more stringent regulations to safeguard their environment and way of life. The board is expected to continue discussions on this topic, with a planning commission meeting scheduled for August 14 to further address community concerns regarding solar projects.