In a recent board meeting, members discussed the approval of tenure charges against educator Stephanie Paskell, a process that has been ongoing for over a year. The meeting highlighted procedural concerns regarding the notification of Paskell about the charges, particularly the delivery of a certified letter and its implications.

Board members sought clarity on whether proper notification had been established, with Trustee Montgomery questioning the lack of proof that Paskell received the certified letter. The letter was reportedly left at her residence after an unsuccessful delivery attempt, raising concerns about the adequacy of the notification process. Montgomery emphasized the importance of having documented proof of receipt, given the serious nature of the tenure charges.

Trustee McIntosh defended the actions taken by the district, stating that the notification process included sending a certified letter, informing the union, and attempting personal delivery. He expressed frustration over the prolonged nature of the situation, asserting that it is detrimental to the district and its students.

Trustee Perkins confirmed that the union had also attempted to reach out to Paskell but had not received a response. The board members acknowledged the gravity of the situation, with some expressing the need for thorough documentation before proceeding with the charges.

The discussion underscored the board's commitment to ensuring due process while also addressing the urgency of the matter, which has implications for the educational environment and the well-being of students. The meeting concluded with a call for a motion to approve the tenure charges, reflecting the board's determination to resolve the issue promptly.