In a recent government meeting, stakeholders expressed significant concerns regarding the Army Corps of Engineers' (Corps) handling of jurisdictional determinations, particularly Approved Jurisdictional Determinations (AJDs) and Preliminary Jurisdictional Determinations (PJDs). Participants highlighted that many Corps districts are failing to issue AJDs, which are crucial for landowners seeking clarity on whether their properties contain federally regulated wetlands. Instead, these districts are prioritizing AJDs linked to permits, effectively pushing landowners towards PJDs, which require them to concede that their land is jurisdictional.

This shift has raised alarms among home builders and farmers, who argue that the lack of clarity and coordination between the Corps and other regulatory agencies, such as the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), complicates compliance with federal regulations. Stakeholders noted that the differing interpretations of what constitutes prior converted cropland between the Corps and NRCS create confusion, leaving landowners in a precarious position when navigating regulatory requirements.

The meeting also underscored the potential legal ramifications of non-compliance with the Clean Water Act, as violations could lead to criminal penalties. Participants criticized the current regulatory environment as unworkable, with agencies deflecting responsibility and failing to provide clear guidance on jurisdictional issues.

Despite previous discussions on these matters, stakeholders expressed frustration that little progress has been made in addressing these ongoing challenges. The meeting concluded with calls for improved communication and a more coherent regulatory framework that would allow landowners to understand their obligations without fear of unintended violations.