During a recent government meeting, lawmakers discussed significant legislation aimed at wildlife conservation and management, highlighting concerns over new federal regulations proposed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Congressman Grossman introduced HR 8632, the Biosafe Act, which seeks to counteract the National Wildlife Refuge System Biological Integrity, Diversity, and Environmental Health Rule. This rule, finalized by the USFWS, has drawn widespread criticism for prioritizing federal policies over local conservation strategies, particularly in states like Wisconsin.

Grossman emphasized that the proposed rule undermines local biologists' authority, shifting decision-making power to Washington, D.C. He noted that over 54,000 public comments opposed the rule, with 29 organizations uniting in a letter to USFWS Director Martha Williams, urging its rescission. Critics argue that the rule could disrupt effective habitat management and limit hunting opportunities, potentially harming local ecosystems and conservation efforts.

Congressman Zinke also spoke in favor of HR 8836, which aims to enhance wildlife corridors and habitat protection. He stressed the importance of bipartisan support for conservation efforts, highlighting the need to adapt to increasing pressures on public lands due to population growth and environmental changes.

Additionally, Congressman Moore presented the Stamp Act, which proposes reallocating excise taxes from firearm suppressor sales to the Pittman-Robertson Wildlife Restoration Trust Fund. This measure aims to boost funding for state wildlife conservation and education programs without imposing new taxes.

The USFWS, represented by Deputy Director Steve Guertin, defended the proposed Biological Integrity rule, asserting that it aims to standardize management practices across wildlife refuges to better address contemporary conservation challenges. Guertin acknowledged the public's strong interest in the proposal, noting that the agency received over 200,000 comments during the extended public comment period.

As discussions continue, lawmakers and conservation advocates remain focused on balancing federal oversight with local expertise to ensure effective wildlife management and habitat preservation.