During a recent government meeting, discussions centered on the Global Fragility Act (GFA) and its implications for addressing violent extremism in regions like the Sahel and Sudan. Lawmakers expressed concern over the persistent instability in these areas, despite two decades of U.S. investment. The GFA aims to apply lessons learned from past conflicts to foster more effective diplomatic and political solutions rather than relying solely on military or foreign assistance.

A key focus was on the situation in Sudan, which is currently facing the largest displacement and hunger crises globally. Officials acknowledged the challenges in securing political will from the main parties involved in the conflict, particularly in light of external influences, such as the United Arab Emirates (UAE), which has been identified as a significant arms supplier to the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). This support has raised alarms regarding potential complicity in war crimes.

In response to these concerns, U.S. officials highlighted ongoing dialogues with the UAE and other nations contributing to the conflict. They emphasized efforts to leverage diplomatic channels to encourage the UAE to cease its support for the RSF and to promote a constructive political dialogue among the conflicting parties. The U.S. has already taken steps, including designating certain entities in the UAE, to signal the seriousness of the situation.

Lawmakers urged the department to intensify its efforts, stressing the urgent need for action given the dire humanitarian conditions in Sudan. The meeting underscored a commitment to a more integrated approach to diplomacy, aiming to address the root causes of conflict and promote sustainable peace in fragile regions.