In a recent government meeting, council members engaged in a heated discussion regarding a public access easement and ongoing coyote concerns affecting local residents. The debate centered around balancing the need for pedestrian access with the safety of families living in the area, particularly in light of reported coyote attacks.

Council member Cheatham emphasized the importance of maintaining pedestrian access while exploring options for coyote management, including potential eradication or relocation. He expressed hesitation to relinquish existing access, arguing that it could serve the community better if utilized properly.

Conversely, council member Mosier argued for the immediate vacation of the easement, citing safety concerns for children and families. He pointed out that the access had not been used effectively and suggested that the city should prioritize the safety and quality of life for residents over an unused pathway.

The discussion was further fueled by public comments from local resident Catherine Skorza, who detailed her family's ongoing struggles with aggressive coyotes that have entered their property. Skorza highlighted the challenges posed by the coyote population, noting that previous attempts by animal control to manage the situation had been ineffective.

As the council deliberated, members expressed a desire for more information regarding the coyote situation, with some indicating they would support the vacation of the easement if no resolution could be found. The meeting concluded with a commitment to revisit the issue in the coming weeks, as council members seek to balance community safety with access rights.