During a recent oversight hearing, tensions escalated as a member of Congress confronted a key witness regarding their refusal to answer specific questions related to an ongoing investigation. The witness, who has been in communication with the FBI, was pressed to disclose the number of shell casings found on a roof, a detail deemed crucial by the questioning congressman.

The congressman accused the witness of evading responsibility, stating, \"If you're supposed to be in charge, if the buck stops with you, how come you can't share the answers?\" This pointed inquiry highlighted concerns about transparency and accountability in the investigation process. The witness maintained that they were not covering up any information, asserting that the matter should be left to the criminal investigation to address.

Despite repeated questioning, the witness did not provide the requested information, leading to further frustration from the congressman, who emphasized that the refusal to answer was a matter of choice rather than inability. The exchange underscored the ongoing challenges faced by oversight bodies in obtaining critical information from officials involved in sensitive investigations.