Controversial quarry project faces public scrutiny and debate

In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the grading plans for a quarry development project, specifically the selection of two pad elevations—135 and 85 feet. Civil engineer Matt Walsh explained that the elevation of 135 feet was chosen due to significant erosion issues in the area, which has struggled to stabilize and revegetate over the years. This elevation serves as the starting point for reclamation efforts, transitioning to a two-to-one slope down to the 85-foot pad, which is crucial for effective drainage management.

Walsh emphasized that the drainage plan aims to direct water towards an existing culvert at Calera Creek, avoiding new tie-ins that could exacerbate erosion. The 85-foot elevation is designed to facilitate gravity drainage towards this culvert, ensuring environmental safety and compliance with local regulations.

However, public comments raised concerns regarding the project's compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Dinah Verbe, a community member, argued that the project lacks a stable and finite description, which is a requirement under CEQA. She highlighted the applicant's inability to provide a maximum fill amount, suggesting that the project's future remains uncertain and could lead to complications.

The meeting underscored the complexities involved in balancing development needs with environmental protections, as stakeholders continue to voice their concerns about the quarry's potential impact on the local ecosystem.