In a recent government meeting, discussions centered around the security measures provided to former President Donald Trump amid credible threats against his life. A key point of contention was whether Trump received the same level of security as a sitting president would have under similar circumstances.

The Director of Security confirmed that he had the authority to enhance security for protectees, including Trump. However, when questioned about the specific security measures in place during a heightened threat assessment, it was revealed that Trump did not receive a full security complement typically afforded to a sitting president.

The Director acknowledged that while Trump was provided with adequate security based on the threat assessment, it did not match the comprehensive protection that would have been standard for a sitting president. Notably, a full Counter Assault Team (CAT) was not present at the venue during this period, raising concerns about the adequacy of the security arrangements in light of the credible threats.

This exchange highlights ongoing discussions about the security protocols for former presidents and the implications of perceived threats, emphasizing the need for robust protective measures in politically charged environments.